When something goes wrong in your department, someone notices it, someone acts on it, and someone decides what to do. None of that is written down anywhere a system can read. So it is lost by the next handover, and gone entirely by the time anyone asks.
Most reporting tools take from the floor and return nothing, which is why they go unused. This one answers the question the reporter actually has — what do I do about this, and who do I call — by retrieving the relevant passage from your Trust's own guidance.
It does not advise. It finds what you already wrote and puts it in front of the person who needs it, while they are still standing there.
One record, read three different ways — because an operations manager, a duty exec and a board paper all need the same facts arranged differently. Nobody re-enters anything and nobody compiles a return.
Bars, trends, categories, hour of day. Your Trust picks how it wants to read its own record — the figures underneath never change.
Everything open, in progress and closed, with who acted and the reason they gave. The handover that usually happens in a corridor, written down.
The position at a glance, assembled from the record rather than from someone's inbox at seven in the morning.
Most Trusts already have a template they are expected to submit against. Tell us what yours looks like — it is usually a matter of days, not a change request.
Once the record exists, questions become answerable. Not predictions, and not advice — counts, sequences and quotations drawn from your own data and your own documents, with the source attached so you can check it before you repeat it.
14 issues logged. The largest group was against imaging, with nine falling between 02:00 and 06:00. Across those dates, elapsed time from bloods requested to results returned averaged 112 minutes, against 74 minutes on the other dates in the period.
Your escalation procedure says: "Where diagnostic turnaround exceeds the internal standard, the shift co-ordinator is to be notified." Recorded as actioned on six of the nine.
Every Trust runs the same checks before anything touches patient data. These are the answers, set out before you have to go looking for them.
Deployed into Azure or Google and configured per deployment, with a UK region for Trusts that require data residency. Your estate, your controls, your retention policy.
Names, dates of birth, NHS numbers and staff identifiers are stripped before the record is written — not masked on display, removed on the way in.
We hold journeys keyed to an encounter, with no identifiers and no key back to one. Not a policy we apply, but something the product is unable to do.
The required extract carries no demographics, no clinical category and no free text — the smallest information-governance surface the product will ever ask for.
A hard floor on small-cohort reporting, enforced in the database rather than by policy. Your Trust can raise it; nobody can lower it.
Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus, assessed under the IASME scheme. Our systems align with the National Data Guardian's 10 Data Security Standards, with a current NHS DSPT submission.
Cyber Essentials and Cyber Essentials Plus, assessed by Cyber Tec Security under the IASME scheme and verifiable above. Both certify Logan Tod as an organisation rather than the software itself.
Our systems align with the National Data Guardian's 10 Data Security Standards, and we maintain an up-to-date NHS Data Security and Protection Toolkit (DSPT) submission. ↗ Check our DSPT registration
Thirty minutes on a synthetic A&E dataset, with the person who designed the method. Bring a real operational problem from your department and we will log it end to end.
We are showing NHS trusts how operational logging works alongside their own pathway data. Sessions run weekly.